Skip to main content

The (slow) wonders of modern technology

I’ve pretty much filled up the 110GB 2.5" PATA (IDE) hard-drive which arrived with my laptop, so I went in search of a replacement.

DMA in Osborne Park had a 500GB drive on their website, but this turned out to be an administration blunder, as they have not sold PATA laptop drives for over 4 months. However, Mel, a truly helpful Thai girl who is reception/sales there confessed that other suppliers might have some. I looked.

Legend, just down the street, had their main supplier (Hitachi) cease manufacture of PATA laptop drives, but managed to convince them to do another run of 1000...of which they have about 300 left, so at most a few months’ supply — all 160GB.

Just around the corner on Hutton Street, Navada still have a handful of drives kicking around, & sold me a 250GB version from Western Digital.

Now to upgrade.

Neither my “real” laptop (hp/Compaq nx9040) nor my “spare” laptop (IBM ThinkPad 30) have space for 2 drives, so I plugged it into a USB caddy.

It turns out that copying (dd) & compressing (bzip2) 110GB worth of partitions takes 2 days & 5 hours this way, but when I started I had no boot CD with which to set up the new drive from scratch, so I needed to copy the data off intact so I could rewrite the root partition (including /boot) at the same offset on the drive, then restore & resize the data partitions.

It also turns out that a smallish download partition containing mostly video clips & MP3 files does not compress very much (8GB becomes 7½GB).

I have just finishing the copy-&-compress onto the /home partition of the 200Gb drive of the ThinkPad (which arrived with a labelled-20GB-really-30GB drive containing XP), but still need to unpack, rewrite & resize the data partitions, despite now having a boot CD, ’coz that’s how I copied them off.

Guessing with the faster 250GB drive, but writing over USB rather than reading, setting up the partitions will take about 3 days. Glad I am not using MS-Windows, as you can pretty much imagine the odds of it staying up ferpectly & not corrupting data across 5½ or more days?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...