Skip to main content

Sir Leo Bobby Jim & the Loathley Lady

King Arthur’s wife, Guinevere, decided that the Round Table Knight, Sir Leo Bobby Jim, needed a lesson in morality.

So... she asked Sir Leo an impossible question, ordering him to return in a year with the answer. If he was right, she would hold a feast, celebrating for him. If he was wrong, Arthur would order him beheaded.

Sir Leo Bobby Jim rode all over the kingdom, asking every woman the question: “What do you really want?”

Each woman gave him a different answer...
  • to be clever...
  • to be wealthy...
  • to be beautiful...
  • et cetera...
After the year, Sir Leo still had no real idea of what women really wanted. He rode back into Camelot, dreading Guinevere’s coming words.

En route, he passed some beautiful dancers in the forest... but as he drew near, they vanished, fading into the mist. In their place stood an old woman. Sigh. Sir Leo decided to ask her his question anyway...

When she turned to reply, he nearly screamed aloud: she was the ugliest creature he had ever seen. One eye looked skyward, the other looked ground-ward, her long nose was bent to the side, her face was deformed & covered in pimples. Her voice, when she spoke, was a selfish, pride-ridden snarl, with a whingey undertone; her natural expression was angry & resentful.

The Loathley Lady gave Leo a ghastly grin, & cackled “I am ugly, snappy, & selfish. I am inconsistent, snappy, self-centred, so even my children can’t deal with me. I can answer your question — but in return there is a thing you must do for me.”

Leo agreed, ”I’ll return as soon as I’ve spoken to Guinevere.”

“The answer to your question is...” she began...
Leo galloped full-tilt to Camelot; when he arrived, he marched up to the Queen: “Your majesty! The thing women really want is... to have their own way!”

Queen Guinever smiled, then so did the many other women in the hall... they proclaimed proudly “That’s it!” & asked querulously, “How did he guess?”

Sir Leo had passed the test!
While everyone else was indulging themselves in the feast, he rode back to the forest. He asked the Loathley Lady what she wanted him to do.

“Marry me!” she replied in a grumpy, snappy voice.

Leo turned white.

However, he’d given his word. That same day, he & the Loathley Lady were wed.
That evening, the Lady turned to her husband. “I can be both beautiful & ugly, but you have to choose. Do you want me fair by night & foul by day? Or foul by night & fair by day?”

Leo Bobby Jim knew exactly what he wanted, but he remembered what he had learned so recently. “Dear wife,” he said, “you must choose. I want you to have your own way.”

When she heard his answer, the Loathley Lady smiled broadly. Sir Leo ghasped! She was no longer a decrepit old hag... but a beautiful young lady! The tone of her voice had changed to a beautiful, clear musical lilt; a twinkling sparkle had grown in her gaze; her broad, cheerful, contented smile lit up the trees; she was beautiful from the core — her heart — out.

“Dear Leo,” she explained, “I was cursed by a rapist & bound under psychiatric compulsion — but your kindness has freed me completely!”

“This is who I really am, the Lady Susan; now I can stay this way for ever!”

A door clattered open, a young man & two cheerful girls burst into the room. “Our mother can...” the young man confirmed, “...&... thank you!”
I’m beginning to view the word “coincidence” very suspiciously. I’ve met my own Susan, who is not at all loathely but has in recent years been through the scratch-n-dent bin of life. I can trust her absolutely, which is a refreshing change.

WRT coincidence, the number of such with this lady is amounting to colossal. Accepting the scientific definition for “impossible,” to be less odds than one in ten-to-the-fifty (1:1050), let me drop a trivial example before you, one of literally hundreds: our birthdays are one day apart.

Walk into a crowd, pick a person, what are the odds of you being born within one literal day (not just day-of-the-year) of them? One in a thousand covers a little under 3 years; one in ten thousand covers about 27 years, so let’s call it one in ten thousand as a reasonable approximation. 1046 left to go... after one coincidence.

Let’s call a typical coincidence one in a thousand. 17 incidents later, what you have is officially impossible. Squared. At 20, it’s not just cubed but beyond tesseracted. I can sit down & easily list out 30, maybe even 60 such incidents. I don’t just dream the impossible dream, I swap jokes with her! (-:

For those who like a few details, her surname is UK but ancestry mostly scattered across Europe, however the single most dominant ancestor is Pawnee, an AmerIndian group. She has blue eyes & brown hair with a tinge of red. Plus other attractive attributes which I am forbidden to list. (-:

She was also (of course) born in the Year of the Tiger, & the town of Leon in her state (about 140km away) features a Jaguar Avenue, so we have a great deal of fun with big pussycats.

Comments

Anonymous said…
;)

hhhmmm....well....I guess, since I get to turn out all beautiful and all dear....
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Hang on, Su-per-woman, you have a head start... plus blue eyes, a sense of humour, wonderful kids (who’ll confess to your talents in being a Mum as well as to your beauty) & grandkids...
GregoryO said…
Is this where I say "oi you two, get a room"?
I've never been tempted to say it on the intarwebs before.

Having said that, I'm happy for you (:
Cheers,
Greg.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...