Skip to main content

All stapled together

Well, my head’s back together...Number One clip & they stapled it shut, this time. Our GP’s going to have fun with staple-removers next week. Yes, the removers were included as part of the deal!

Surgery was remarkably quick, & I woke up later that afternoon with a complete head & minimal pain (well... truly imperceptible pain for having a chunk of metal screwed into my head, but paracetamol is still needed; applause for the absence of anything stronger).

I’m amazed that I can be out of hospital two days after the surgery. Not saying everything’s perfect, but for the work that was done it’s a remarkably quick turn-around time.

I’ve met lots of other patients whose lives had been much improved by a few short minutes (or in some cases hours) of cut-&-paste — it leads me to wonder how well we’d do if we truly understood surgery, rather than simply building on our current collection of functional rituals, which are already impressive.

It also leads me to wonder how much of this technology can be exported to places which lack any of it & how much of the technology involved can be simplified enough to make this practial. Certainly not all of it that I know of, but perhaps enough to make a positive difference?

I my own case, we wait to see how well it all worked, because there are nasties which can reveal themselves after days, weeks, months... however, Professor Stokes seemed quite pleased with the results so far, which I find very encouraging.

Comments

sen said…
great news mate :-)
Congrats and goodluck!
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Thanks guys!

I'll probably find out on Monday when the surgeon inpects his work, just how well it really is going so far.

If all goes according to schedule, our GP will clip the staples out on Friday.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
As a later update says, the surgeon will be clipping the staples on the coming Monday, not the GP. Sad, he would have found it interesting and challenging.

I also found out that my cranioplasty is likely to take a while to seal my skull properly, which means I can't fly in a pressurised aeroplane for a month or few. So... no conf this year, sadly. I might get a video of my presentation made.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...