Skip to main content

The GIMP 2.3.10

I bumped by laptop up to Mandriva 2007.0 — I think more from a sense of masochism than to suit any driving need — but it’s turned out reasonably well. I say “reasonably” because somewhere in the update tangle I lost my KDE taskbar, but on the other hand the GUI interface works remarkably faster & more smoothly than it once did.

I also got to taste a few newer products, including OpenOffice 2.0.3 and The GIMP 2.3.10. OpenOffice is noticeably faster (I think 2.0.3-5 is a slightly 2.0.4-ish version) but there are a number of y’all who read this who'd be interested in the changes in The GIMP, so I'll write about that for a moment or few.

The most obvious change is newer, shinier icons ’n’ stuff, but there are many slight improvements “across the board” as well.

For example, many more tools are built right into the menus; the “Colors” menus now sports 14 main entries, plus four submenus. The Edit menu also sports Paste, Paste-Into and a Paste submenu containing New-Image, New-Brush & New-Pattern. The Layer menu now has a more extensive 10-entry Mask submenu. There’s a new toolbox tool called “Align or arrange layers and other items”.

Et cetera, everywhere. The Text tool now has more items for alignment & hinting. The “Blur and Sharpen” tool now has neat little “Convolve” options. There’s even an updated “Padding Color” entry in the View menu, to change the way that the “transparency” padding works.

Ah, yes... & saving to .ico (Icon) files now works directly & well. Not to mention compressed XCFs (XJTs) and PhotoShop (PSD) files. And C source-code. And various types of HTML. Even ASCII-art!

There are also about twice as many Artistic and Distorts filters compared with GIMP 2.2, including one called Cartoon, which takes a photo & renders it down to look very much like a cartoon artist had drawn it. Plus much fancier features.

All in all, GIMP now strikes me as faster, better-polished & tested than ever before. By that, I mean far fewer “rough edges” rather than mysterious elisions of errors or short-falls. GIMP has always been relatively reliable for me, just a bit klunky around the edges, not feeling completely “worn in,” so to speak. Well, now they’ve got that far down the “to-do” list & de-klunked many of the edges... hurrah! Even the “Newsprint” distort seems to be working ferpectly now.

Perhaps the single greatest contribution to its sense of completeness is the addition of menu entries which take used-to-be-per-image features down to a layer’s or channel’s worth at a time. It feels like the developers are now confident enough in their tools to begin varying how they’re applied rather than settling for all-or-nothing options alone.

As to the rest of the Mandriva 2007.0 features, they could probably be summed up as greater shinyness; the default screen-saver, for example, is now an eye-opening 3D fireworks display. The installation was as neat/smooth as always & the supporting mirrors came completely to life within a day or two. If anything exceptional happens, I’ll let y’all know.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...