...on purposelessness as a cause, with some Islamic (in mostly English) background (if I get an attribution, capitalisation or something like handedness wrong anywhere here, please post a response correcting my blunder so I know enough to repair it):
Humans are required to have iman (belief and conviction in and about Allah) and do ‘amal (i.e., have their iman reflected in a righteous course of conduct vis-à-vis Allah, fellow humans, and the environment). The creation of humans, and their existence on Earth, is a deliberate divine act not an unguided, purposeless event.
[...]
After all, it is absurd to assume that chance causes. Chance describes; chance does not cause. Even in normal linguistic definitions, when we say that two persons meet by chance, we do not mean that they are acting haphazardly in life.
That’s an interesting piece of linguistic realisation... and according to Dad’s main Chinese friend, this works as well (as badly, that is) in Chinese also (and — according to some other friends — Laotian linguistics work the same way).
Comments