Skip to main content

SCOX flying into the ground, it seems

It looks like SCOX have flown into the ground with their latest Court motion; they have had a Judge agree that SCOX failed to comply with at least three direct Court orders in the case, and modulo some minor fan-dancing they appear to have lost every important argument and point — this despite their doomed legal reasoning being a very impressive swansong about nothing real.

SCOX shares are also dipping (5% the day I posted) as 3rd parties see the writing on the wall— er, the floor? — er... maybe, the stock charts?

Hopefully, this means that the evidently greedy, selfish, malicious and destructive wannabee-millionaires shoving the SCOX corpse along its course are running out of room to dodge, so they will soon be back to much more honourable occupations; perhaps like keeping cardboard boxes warm in remote junky alleys — if the other more-honourable box-heaters can be abused into putting up with them doing that.

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
Gotta love the nett profit, as well... minus $35-and-a-bit billion USD on $36bn USD.

I guess that share price fall may be a reaction to those numbers on top of (well, beneath) everything else.
15 May, 2006 09:57
Leon RJ Brooks said…
...and at their current -36.55% average asset return rate, they are pretty much an epitaph after less than 3 years.

A small, low-cost epitaph, it has to be.
15 May, 2006 10:05
Leon RJ Brooks said…
The drop was despite one of SCOX's last-minute share-price-prop bids, which have been characteristic of the stock since at least the time they started pulling this big standover tactic. Without said prop-bid (whatever its proper name is), the real drop would have been much closer to 10%. That will not help their abysmal [non-]asset return rate.
15 May, 2006 20:31
Anonymous said…
but what about the SCAMP stack? Surely that is going to make them a *mint*.

yes, SCAMP sounds like TRAMP. I'm not sure what a TRAMP stack would be, but it'd probably involve something nicer than SCAMP.

Let's face it - SCAMP sounds like something you tell your kids not to pick at.

It gives me a warm feeling every time somebody moves off SCO.
15 May, 2006 22:32
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

every-application-is-part-of-a-toolkit at work

I have a LibreOffice Impress slideshow that I wish to turn into a narrated video. 1. export the slideshow as PNG images (if that is partially broken — as at now — at higher resolutions, Export Directly as PDF then use ‘pdftoppm’ (from the poppler-utils package) to do the same). 2. write a small C program (63 lines including comments) to display those images one at a time, writing a config file entry for Imagination (default transition: ‘cross fade’) based on when the image-viewer application (‘display,’ from the GraphicsMagick suite) is closed on each one; run that, read each image aloud, then close each image in turn. 3. run ‘Imagination’ over the config file to produce a silent MP4 video with the correct timings. 4. run ‘Audacity’ to record speech while using ‘SMPlayer’ to display the silent video, then export that recording as a WAV file. 4a. optionally, use ‘TiMIDIty’ to convert a non-copyright-encumbered MIDI tune to WAV, then import that and blend it with the speech (as a quiet b
1 comment
Read more

new life for an old (FTX) PSU, improved life for one human

the LEDs on this 5m strip happen to emit light centred on a red that does unexpectedly helpful things to (and surprisingly deeply within) a human routinely exposed to it. it has been soldered to a Molex connector, plugged into a TFX power supply from a (retired: the MoBo is cactus) Small Form Factor PC, the assorted PSU connectors (and loose end from the strip) have been taped over. the LED strip cost $10.24 including postage, the rest cost $0, the PSU is running at 12½% of capacity, consumes less power than a laptop plug-pack despite running a fan. trial runs begin today.
Post a Comment
Read more

boundaries

pushing the actual boundaries of the physical (not extremes, the boundaries themselves) can often remove barriers not otherwise perceived. one can then often resolve an issue itself, rather than merely stonewalling at the physical consequences of the issue.
Post a Comment
Read more