Skip to main content

Weird native flowers

life cycle of native flower

Australian wildlife seems to specialise in being... different. This flower is native to the Joondalup area, but I’ve never seen it elsewhere.

It starts out as a reasonably normal-looking bud, then opens to show a bundle of pale green rods with darker tips. The rods lengthen, then separate and spread. The spread rods then each split and “peel” back from a very slim translucent core to form a pillow of pale yellow curls bearing the normal polleny, nectary bits that the bees so enjoy wallowing in.

This then collapses down again to a dry, leathery core which falls apart to reveal a few seed-pods. The pods split to fling the seeds a few meters, where (if they’re fortunate) they get to start a new bush.

The leaves are as sharp as they look. The bushes typically stand about two metres tall, and they are typical (for Western Australian flora, at least) in their response to lack of water. First they rush any existing seed-pods to completion, then the whole bush dies suddenly and goes brown in a matter of days.

This is how I was able to snap a complete cycle in one sitting. These bushes are just north of the Winton Road light industrial business district, in the freeway reserve alongside the train tracks. One had flowers in various stages of development, and its neighbour had given up the ghost, hastening the seeds through their final stages.

This was an enjoyable ride, and felt almost like real exercise. I dropped our van off in Winton Road to get fixed (clutch slave cylinder was dying) and cycled back home via Lakeside shopping centre and this spot. The FOSTFOLG Beastie performed flawlessly again.

Because the van is a Japanese-domestic (“Toyota Master Ace Surf Diesel 4WD”), the slave cylinder has to wing its way across the Nullarbor tonight for installation tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...