Skip to main content

Metro-equivalent broadband

Reading Simon Rumble’s ’blog post on country broadband, & a few thoughts crossed my furry little mind.

I have had experience with broadband in a small country town (in Western Tasmania) & despite being spread out around the corner of a hill, reticulating broadband to the entire town could easily be done using two cheap (AUD$50 apiece) TP-Link wireless routers with a top speed of 100 megabits. The problem would be getting a pipe to the rest of the world, however the next town, 15km away, has ADSL so a tap into the bandwidth for that (which has to be run along the highway that our primary town is built across) seems reasonable.

That solution won’t suit everywhere but in many cases it should be practical to alter a standard/cheap router to cover maybe 100 households per throw, given only an uplink.

Some uplink stuff can be done reliably/cheaply as well, with 100Mb via hops of several 10s of km at a time via simple, cheap Yagi or dish antennae.

Now the show-stopper will be the politics.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is essentially what the Optus/Elders OPEL project was in the process of delivering, before it was scotched as Not Invented Here by the incoming government. Providing a reliable service in the unlicensed spectrum isn't likely, but Internode have shown that you can do very good fixed wireless in the licensed spectrum.

The major issue for much of the bush is that Telstra own the only backhaul capacity, and there isn't a business case for a competing fibre. That means any non-Telstra entity has to pay monopoly carrier prices.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Thanks, Shermozle.

I think it also needs to be said that living in a city is not all about costs, but that there are hidden costs also.

You get better access to public transport, shopping, airlines, social amenities (associations, clubs & the like), a multitude of facilities.

Some of the hidden costs include a certain amount of dehumanisation as you become ever more blended into the Joe/Joanne Average character.

You do not necessarily escape this effect by fleeing to the country, as a disease is not so diluted by exposure to people there, so it tends to be more concentrated, chronic & catastrophic.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...