Skip to main content

Visual/spatial logic on Squid & on children

The Problem

I ran across an example of visual/spatial perception today which fell into place when I thought about how I’d arrived at a conclusion which happened to use it.

Customer was using Squid at a remote office to interact with intranet work pages served by Apache from a central machine.

Clients were sometimes getting good results, sometimes getting part-pages, occasionally getting nothing.

This did not “feel” right for either Squid or Apache, either of which tends to die fairly obviously, with an error page or a log entry, or both.

So I asked a simple question: did the internet pages get fetched over the VPN (OpenVPN) or directly? Through the VPN. Hmmm.

Careful scanning of the VPN config files revealed that it was using ping & ping-restart to keep the link alive. The ping time had been set to 280 seconds, which is right for not hammering the NAT/Masquerading on a router, which is often set to timeout at 5 minutes (300 seconds). The ping-restart time, however, was much less, at 120 seconds.

This meant that the link would be shut down & rebuilt about every 6 minutes, which syslog showed was happening. Setting them to 230 & 280 then restarting the openvpn service resulted in steady operation.

The lesson?

Thinking about the process visually/spatially (wholistically), rather than in terms of the operations of individual components, had yielded an effectively instantaneous solution. Customer had spent days approaching it from an auditory/sequential perspective & is definitely not a dumb bunny.

The children

I know a young lad & his sister who think like that, with an even younger brother who hasn’t yet had to show his stripes — but odds are strong that he will think alike too. In fact, I’m willing to bet that the youngest also has an emotive cognate like his sister & a niece of mine (niece can walk through a room in seconds & then tell you how the people in it are feeling, how they’re related to each other, etc).

I really do hope to get an opportunity to work with these young geniuses to find out how to actually use this talent rather than ignoring it, letting it be buried under the mundanity of a school which clearly does not understand how these yungun’s actually work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...