Skip to main content

It's not the problems you _expect_ which get you...

OK, here we are in the middle of Perth suburbia, cycling smoothly along bitumen roads, & the (rather excellent) bike develops a problem.

If I hadn’t physically seen it, I’d be struggling to believe it, since it hadn’t happened to me in about 30 years (& then in a remote mining town): I put a thorn through the tyre (& evidently the tube as well).

By “thorn” I’m talking about a 3-corner jack AKA cat-head AKA double-gee. The tube wasn’t thorn-proof, & thinking back over those 30 years (many of them spent cycling in Perth) I can fully understand why.

Sigh. I really need more stuff to fix — not. Let’s see if I can get hold of a thorn-proof tube.

Comments

Unknown said…
It's not too rare - last year I managed to get about 9 or more of these thorns in one tyre in one incident! 6 actually penetrated and punctured my tube. I also missed one of the small little thorn bits when replacing the tube and managed to get a subsequent slow puncture.

Last year after riding around 3000km I got rather good at replacing tubes :) This year I've already done close to 1500km and only have had 1 puncture. luck of the draw!

What you may want to do Leon instead of new tyres is get yourself some tyre liners - it goes in between the tyre and tube and can help in these situations. The other option is that + slime (injected into the tube, automatically seals punctures).
20 March, 2008 11:15
Anonymous said…
When in Broome a few years ago we had to replace the all of the tubes in our 3 wheel pram. At the bike shop where we got it done, they suggested some bright green liquid to put in the tubes. Apparently it stays in a liquid state and fills little holes and dries creating a seal. Almost 3 years on we haven't replaced any more tubes.

Sorry I can't remember the name of it, maybe try your local bike shop.
20 March, 2008 11:51
Anonymous said…
When in Broome a few years ago we had to replace the all of the tubes in our 3 wheel pram. At the bike shop where we got it done, they suggested some bright green liquid to put in the tubes. Apparently it stays in a liquid state and fills little holes and dries creating a seal. Almost 3 years on we haven't replaced any more tubes.

Sorry I can't remember the name of it, maybe try your local bike shop.
20 March, 2008 11:51
sen said…
I hve the blighters growing in my front lawn.. (that reminds me, I really needs to fix that).
A trick my old grand father taught me was to split open an old tube (cut the valve off) and layer that inside the tyre before putting a good tube in, it's a dirt cheap way of giving you thorn protection...
20 March, 2008 21:53
Leon RJ Brooks said…
1 shop in 6 had 28” (700mm) tubes, but no thorn-proof the right width — except for some of those green-filled versions, which had a different (high-pressure) valve.

So I got a standard (thornless?) tube, crammed it in (was a bit fiddly getting that underlay widget to work) & it worked flawlessy today.
21 March, 2008 00:36
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...
5 comments
Read more

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...
5 comments
Read more

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...
Post a Comment
Read more