Skip to main content

eeePC appliances

I have a potential career adjustment pending, which revolves around setting Asus eeePCs up as conceptual appliances.

The eeePC would have another chunk of Flash for writing stuff like log entries, DNS updates, cache records, maybe email onto, which would conceptually be replaceable in situ by staff. The idea would be to plug in another (USB2 stick-based) chunk of Flash, which gets the structure & basic data from the old writeable Flash copied onto it, then remounted to replace it, allowing the old Flash to be unplugged & (if necessary) snail-mailed to head office.

One immediate “appliance” function would be to act as a VPN, proxy-cache (& filter), DNS secondary, perhaps SMTP sender, & also (potentially alongside the VPN) as an ssh (potentially equals PuTTY) port-forwarder.

An aspect which seemed initially appealing (but the wireless connectivity issues in one client city will probably can this idea) is to deploy it behind a suitable ($85 retail) wireless ADSL router, & use the wireless link to securely forward Internet data to the eeePC, then its built-in Ethernet port to relay that to the clients. In reality, the built-in Ethernet will talk to the router (maximises connectivity to at least the eeePC), & a USB Ethernet interface will talk to the internal switch.

The advantages as an appliance include modularity, easy replaceability (& can be snail-mailed in an Express Post pak plus a layer of bubble-wrap), built-in monitoring (screen) & controls (keyboard, mousepad), built-in Ethernet, replaceable/disposeable/portable storage, ruggedness, size, low power consumption (& brown-out protection, extensible via USB-powered DSL routers), extensibility (3xUSB2 ports, SD Flash socket), & it can come in a cute pink colour.

Comments

sen said…
Interesting idea...
Certainly they're brilliant little machines, I cant wait to get hold of one and stick Ubuntu on it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRP8fPcaSzI
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Yep. & Internode have an Ubuntu mirror, so even on “a heavy download month” (as Rea put it) you can get “free” updates.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...