Skip to main content

Wireless rechargeable high-intensity reading light for $23.75

Ingredients: 1xLED Torch ($4 from Reject store), 3xAAA eneloop NiMH rechargeable ($6.50 a cell from Tricky Dickey), wire coat-hanger (free after shop use), super-glue ($1 for a pack of 4 tubes from Reject), large/thin peg (free from random source, guess about 12¢ ea in large-ish packs new). Will publish photos in a few days (’net access permitting).

Method: swap boring (Super Heavy Duty) AAAs with torch for rechargeable. Wind coat-hanger around torch to not obscure the unscrewable end, optionally super-glue into place. Match short straight length of coat-hanger against side of peg, super-glue it into place (range of about 45cm for large-ish books, 30cm for simple paperbacks.

Useage: click switch on unscrewable end of torch, clip peg onto book cover, read.

These little $4 torches have 9 very intense LEDs therein, so light up the book quite well; the “eneloop” badged (Sanyo) 800mAh AAA cells drive them quite brightly (will drive high-current loads like cameras quite well), & retain 85% of a full charge over an entire idle year, even in coldness.

Advantage in doing this manually is cost ($23.75 vs $33.95 plus batteries ($53.45 all up)) & immediate availability of readily rechargeable power cells & yer dunnit yerself (craftsmanship, even if (especially if) it takes a few tries to build the ideal beastie).

For bonus craftsmanship points, spung the LED assembly from the torch & tweak the LEDs to spread more, so cover entire page at a shorter range.

Buy 3 more cells & you can recharge spent cell sets faster than you can spend charged ones.

One-off construction cost: obtain a charger & 4xAA (not AAA, sadly) NiMH cells from BigW for $18.85 a set. Run camera, bike lamp, other devices on the AAs.

Optional extra mechanism: obtain clip-board, glue coat-hanger to clip-board (maybe in 2x locations) instead of peg, place book on clip-board to read.

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
Just dabbled in a Noam Chomsky book, which quotes Wilhelm von Humboldt saying:

“man never regards what he possesses as so much his own, as what he does; & the labourer who tends a garden is perhaps in a truer sense its owner then the listless voluptuary who enjoys its fruits.”

I think that emphasises (in a non-tech flavour) a core principle of FOSS.
10 February, 2008 11:19
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Also discovered a Reject store in the Booragoon shopping centre, so now sand-gropers (as well as crow-eaters & probably others) can easily acquire this electrical wonderment. (-:

KMart also has rechargeable AAAs for about a dollar (each) less.
12 February, 2008 20:51
GregoryO said…
I got some NiMH AAs and AAAs for <$2 ea a few months ago - a friend of mine is a supplier of sorts. Minimum quantity of four. Not the largest mA rating, but a pretty good deal in my books.
25 February, 2008 12:22
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...
5 comments
Read more

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...
5 comments
Read more

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...
Post a Comment
Read more