Skip to main content

Photogenic

Ah, the wonders of an accessible command line! To think that some meat-head boasted about removing it from his OS? Anyway...

Was given the task of preparing some photos to be inspected & maybe used by an Eastern States co, one of the features being a photo release form — only available in PDF format.

So... fired up pdftohtml & now had an editable (not pretty, but close enough) HTML version of it. Easiest way to edit it was OpenOffice Writer, so done.

Difficulty was going to be getting mentions of each photo written into the form, so I left it saved as HTML, with a keyword plonked into the doc at the point where photo refs were going to appear, in a paragraph by itself. Now I can use gawk to search for that keyword & replace it with a table of image files (system “cat”).

So far, so good, but the image names weren’t regarded as distinctive enough by themselves, so out came identify (an ImageMagick tool) & md5sum so now each image has distinctive identification.

The next problem is HTML — while it displays just fine on someone’s browser, it also includes my signature as a raw image file. Not safe. So I dug around & found a PHP script (dompdf) which churns out PDFs from HTML. Fine idea, but it depended on a couple of libraries I don’t have handy, easiest correction being to break out the scalpel & remove the related sections of code. Done. Yes, I know that it’s still feasible to exculpate the image from a PDF (how else would it print out?) but it’s hard enough to stop the vast majority of readers.

Then I added a simple little script (32 sparse lines) to make thumbnails & display each section in a very simple index page, & another to churn out archives of the primary image files so the crew from the “largely unexplored” sections of Oz could grab a whole section at a time. tar plus gzip doesn’t beat proprietary-format zip noticeably for JPEG files, but bzip2 won by a few percent. BASH variable-processing features make selection & the like dead simple.

Then I reclined in the luxury of mod-cons: pushing 140MB to the web-server took only a few minutes (at about a 1.5 real megabits per second) over cheapo ADSL2 connections (wireless this end, wired that) via WAIX, a local exchange point which made the traffic effectively free.

I can sit dow, type one short command, & the whole lot can be re-done from that mysterious engineering substance, “scratch.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...