Skip to main content

Fluffy comets — not!

I have occasionally wondered about movie depictions of comets as big, fluffy balls (albeit sometimes with surges & waves adding a bit of character) since the only other nominally fluffy things out there are stars or gas clouds, either of which are relatively huge in comparison. Fluffy things “not out there” can be quite different.

Now the Thunderbolts crew have run across some information which seems to show that comets are most un-fluffy with corners & other sharp bits.

This accords well with my thought that in order to survive anything substantial by way of a number of orbits, these bright little suckers would have to have a correspondingly substantial physical makeup.

It also accords better with the observation that in only a few decades, astronomical things have been watched changing, which of course renders the straight gradualist approach to astronomy fairly pointless (which will of course be, er, naturally unsettling to some people).

Oddly enough, this kind of observation also applies to Open Source software vis a vis its effect on the “gradualist” software business.

Items like OpenOffice, Linux, The GIMP etc have pretty much blindsided traditional commercial software providers — & the effects/consequences of that blindsiding are far from complete. Fundamental characteristics such as there simply not being a competitor to buy or pressure out of business will, I think, have the deepest & most lasting effects.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I found your blog because of the fact that I do love to read about comets (sometimes I like to scare myself.

Anyway, there is this article called "Tunguska the Horns of the Moon and Evolution" (a really long title with tons of info in the article) that you should read, if you have the chance.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/148819-Tunguska-the-Horns-of-the-Moon-and-Evolution

This web news source has quite a number of articles about comets. And, their web's motto is a "world for people who think". I like that. I like to think I'm a thinker.

Well, it's away to google more comet articles. Always looking for something new. Heads up, and watch the sky!
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Lotsa weird stuff there, but an interesting POV or 2 as well. Would take half a lifetime to assess. Next!

Popular posts from this blog

new life for an old (FTX) PSU, improved life for one human

the LEDs on this 5m strip happen to emit light centred on a red that does unexpectedly helpful things to (and surprisingly deeply within) a human routinely exposed to it. it has been soldered to a Molex connector, plugged into a TFX power supply from a (retired: the MoBo is cactus) Small Form Factor PC, the assorted PSU connectors (and loose end from the strip) have been taped over. the LED strip cost $10.24 including postage, the rest cost $0, the PSU is running at 12½% of capacity, consumes less power than a laptop plug-pack despite running a fan. trial runs begin today.

every-application-is-part-of-a-toolkit at work

I have a LibreOffice Impress slideshow that I wish to turn into a narrated video. 1. export the slideshow as PNG images (if that is partially broken — as at now — at higher resolutions, Export Directly as PDF then use ‘pdftoppm’ (from the poppler-utils package) to do the same). 2. write a small C program (63 lines including comments) to display those images one at a time, writing a config file entry for Imagination (default transition: ‘cross fade’) based on when the image-viewer application (‘display,’ from the GraphicsMagick suite) is closed on each one; run that, read each image aloud, then close each image in turn. 3. run ‘Imagination’ over the config file to produce a silent MP4 video with the correct timings. 4. run ‘Audacity’ to record speech while using ‘SMPlayer’ to display the silent video, then export that recording as a WAV file. 4a. optionally, use ‘TiMIDIty’ to convert a non-copyright-encumbered MIDI tune to WAV, then import that and blend it with the speech (as a quiet b...

boundaries

pushing the actual boundaries of the physical (not extremes, the boundaries themselves) can often remove barriers not otherwise perceived. one can then often resolve an issue itself, rather than merely stonewalling at the physical consequences of the issue.