Skip to main content

Puppet show

It took a while for this to sink in, but after some conversations with an amazing variety of people from Perth, WA, I’ve come to realise why a particular puppet show went undetected for far too long.

Puppet show?

That’s where someone (herein, “the Puppet Master”) invents a look-alike for a significant person in their lives, then starts reacting to the puppet, not the reality.

This sounds silly, but for modelling purposes the puppet has some significant advantages over real life, an obvious one being that the puppet will do what you tell it to, whereas real life is seldom so accommodating.

There is a big disadvantage, of course, in that you don’t have the “name” (character & authority) of the one you’re Puppetting — & we all know that bad things happen if you walk up & arrest someone “because I am a policeman,” but two bad things happen because not only to you have to be a policeman, you have to also have a specific reason for needing to arrest someone... which reason is utterly useless without a suitable Name & in the case of the Puppet Master, they have neither Name nor reason so absolutely no chance of eventual success.

Now, a Puppet Master can be a fearsome (albeit sometimes silly) thing to behold, but things get seriously, um, interesting when the Puppet Master themselves becomes subject to the control of other Puppet Masters, who as well as running a “straight” (hah!) puppet show themselves, have grown to regard this as too mundane, so instead of settling for altering the puppet’s behaviour, have stooped to altering the actual behaviour of real people.

It might strike you as unlikely that a Puppet Master should fall subject to other Masters, but in practice the (effectively enslaved) subMaster becomes so accustomed to the puppetry process that they no longer notice when it’s aimed at them rather than by them.

This becomes doubly damning when the Puppet Slave has been quietly running their own show this way since childhood; amongst other things, there’s no steep contrast to signal the onset of either Puppet Mastery or Puppet Slavery.

Some of the Perth people (a few more directly involved than others) tried to warn the Puppet Slave that this was no real game of any sort, that they needed to reconsider everything or lose the lot, but apparently this warning was mis-read as a kind of team-play manoeuvre, so Slave seems to be working on destroying practically everything of value in their life (as a “necessary sacrifice” although their basis for that assertion is in essence a lie also), piece by piece, while simultaneously projecting an image of surprised injury — another old game which teenage friends once mocked Slave openly for playing.

Oh, & ignoring this kind of thing, pretending it will go away, is not an option for a Christian, either. Christians are told in many places (for example, 1 Corinthians 10:5) to actively undermine such falsehoods.

One wonders what surprises the Slave will emit next.

The Slave wonders why nobody trusts them (⟪most unfair, but they were losers anyway⟫).

Stay tuned, I guess.

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
Ah, another little light comes on: I suddenly understand why I’m being accused of doing stuff that is quite alien to my approach to life.

I’ve been Puppetted, my pseudo-self Puppet did these things in his mental existence — amplified from minor events in real life — so they seem real to the Slave.

In turn, it seems reasonable to Slave to accuse me of them.

It also seems impossible to ever, ever directly specify them to me lest the Puppet Show be suddenly exposed, which explains still more confusion.

Can’t say I’m at all happy about the implied results, one way or another (especially the other lives being trashed with Slave’s), but the situation at least seems more understandable.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Oh... one other impromptu suggestion has been made to me about how a Master might fall prey to being Puppetted.

Apparently, it has to do with the kind of Master Bait being used.

The theory runs along the lines that once enough Baiting proves intolerably pleasant for the Master, they effectively become Slave to it rather than risk losing it.

The pun is kind of sad, but I think the actual point stands.

My response is: it’s not worth it. No matter how desperate you might be for pleasure, this kind of Bait is poison.

It will undermine your life, will destroy you, & perhaps worst of all, will encourage the Slavers by their apparent success, so they are more likely to go on to destroy others.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...