Skip to main content

Oh, my Govindas!

The name in question has been assigned to a little restaurant in Northbridge run by the Hare Krishna crew. What strikes me about this place is not the “Hare whatever” written up everywhere, nor pictures of an old dude who appears to be important to them (& a prolific author), but the excellent food.

By “excellent,” I’m not so much referring to how fancy or intricately presented the food is, as to the straight-up quality of it. These fellas evidently take the growing & preparation of their food quite seriously, so what lands on your plate is quite tasty & wholesome.

It’s also served in reasonable quantity, so you’ll neither starve nor fight to finish it.

In economic terms, it’s pretty reasonable. A meal (including dessert & drink) is $7 (or $6 for concessions), & add $1 for the containers if it’s takeaway. So by adding a couple of samosas, I was able to eat one full meal & walk away with two other pretty reasonable meals for a grand total of $16.80.

I did ask, & they’re not fussy about things like microwaving food (although they very rarely do so when preparing it themselves), which is quite convenient as everywhere I work in the city has a microwave oven.

Oh, yes, & I’ve been told by a Christian to read 1 Corinthians 8:4, which says:

So concerning the eating of things offered in sacrifice to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, & that there is no other God but [our] one.

I’m not a real expert, but that seems to pretty well cover the objections (AFAICT, IMESHO, insert acronyms to suit taste — although those fellas with the statues set all over their places might object). (-:

Comments

Anonymous said…
There's a Govindas in Darlinghurst in Sydney as well. Good food, and huge bonus points for having an inhouse cinema - perfect for lazing around after eating far too much. :-)
sen said…
is it a safe place to eat for someone with zero tolerance for curry/spicy food??

From memory those guys are vegetarians as well aren't they?
Leon RJ Brooks said…
pete: sounds like a proper bonus

senectus: they curry a fair bit (including their samosas) but you can ask & they’ll leave out the curry. It’s gentle curry, rather than bitey. They have a nice yoghurty drink, & (curry-less) desserts.

They also now have a thing which is kinda like a baked (not fried) samosa.

I grabbed a flavour packet from Kakulas (across the road) to go with (well, make) some noodle soup... & it must be said to be, well, curried. Just about lifted my lips off, couldn’t actually taste the noodles. (-:

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...