Skip to main content

Dear Ms Giddings

ROSEBERY HOSPITAL ACTION COMMITTEE

C/- # Nameof Street
Rosebery   Tasmania   7470

8th October 2007

The Hon. Lara Giddings, MHA
10th Floor Executive Building
15 Murray Street
Hobart   Tasmania   7000

Facimile: 6233 ####

Dear Ms Giddings,

Members of the Rosebery Hospital Action Committee attended an announcement by the Prime Minister Mr Howard today in Burnie, at which he pledged $1m of Federal funding to the Rosebery Hospital to restore services cut by the State Government. Mr Howard says “that should tide the hospital over until the State Government can fund [it] with money saved from the Mersey Hospital takeover.”

As a result we, the people of Rosebery and surrounding areas, respectfully request the Minister for Health and Human Services to take advantage of the Prime Minister’s offer by immediately acting to:

  • halt renovation work in such a way that the building is safe and serviceable as a hospital;
  • return the beds and inpatient equipment removed from the facility; and
  • commence reinstatement of nursing staff (both permanent and casual) with a view to recommencing inpatient services within the month.

Members of the action committee were delighted with the Prime Minister’s announcement and fully endorse his call for the State Government to “do the right thing” by the Rosebery and surrounding communities. We believe this is a vote of confidence in the people of the West Coast and the mining industry.

We see this as an opportunity for Local, State and Federal Government to work together with the community and we seek an immediate indication of support from uyou in regard to the Rosebery Hospital.

The committee looks forward to a discussion with your office in the immediate future on a way forward for the Rosebery Hospital.

Yours Faithfully,

Paul O’Bryan
Chairperson


I was handed a copy of this by a Zinifex bloke (hi!) at a community meeting in the Rosebery RSL, attended by a couple of Liberal politicians & attended by people from Rosebery, Tullah, Zeehan, Strahan, Queenstown, Cradle Mountain (much of the West Coast) & from companies such as Zinifex, Allegiance (from their Avebury mine) & (sorta) Renison Bell. Much discussion was had on the Primary Health Services Plan, various aspects of Rural Health & it’s impact on the now-blossoming mining industry.

The $1m would keep the hospital alive for about 4 years (based on existing figures), & prevent patients from being raced by ambulances (which the “Medical Centre” no longer has) for over an hour & a half up to Burnie (the alternative is 45 minutes to Queenstown, who have a smaller hospital & the next stop is Hobart — at least five hours further on in daylight.

This racing would be taking place, inevitably, over the same roads on which an accident has likely happened (for a while there, Bulgobac River, a little North of Tullah was claiming a truck a week — real two-trailer log-trucks, not delivery vans — which typically take about half a day to arrange cranes & rescue vehicles for. Each.). IMESHO, having some of the responsible pollies actually living in Rosebery, Tullah or Zeehan — where they’d be as much at risk as anyone else — would go a long way towards having them realise & fully experience the real risks involved, & cause a massive change in attitudes.

The options available to the Rosebery people are limited, & all of them except eating crow & so turning reasonable wind up with great armsful of egg in Lara’s political face. So of course she’s deferring action until “after” the next election — whenever that turns out to add up to.

Comments

sen said…
Do a search on "Canberra Hospital" and see what results you get.
The Federal Gov has been fully "Managing" the Canberra Hospital for years... they don't have a very good track record at that hospital.

If I was living down your way I wouldn't be too excited about the Fed Gov takeover of the Mersey Hospital...

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...