Skip to main content

Automatixly

Recently found a new Ubuntu toy: Automatix.

This is vaguely akin to the PLF (Penguin Liberation Front) repositories under Mandriva, except that it’s a little more willing to step outside of the boundaries for items like codecs, Opera browser, TrueType fonts, etc.

Altogether this makes it quite handy for that handful of little annoyances (inconveniences) which are typical of a new setup.

Welcome though this is, it still doesn’t magic away the handicap of a 500MHz Celeron pushing an ancient video chipset through SD-RAM, so this beastie is going to transform itself into a twin-CPU Athlon driving a GeForce chipset through DDR. The difference between that & the absolutely cheapest CPU/mobo/video combination I can buy new is about $17 — definitely not worth the messing around.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think you ought to read Matthew Garrett's technical audit of Automatix before gushing further praises about it.

You can find the audit at: http://mjg59.livejournal.com/77440.html
19 August, 2007 23:45
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Hmmm.

Thanks for the link, interesting reading.

It seems that Automatix is fine for someone like me who can beat his head against the odd problem without tending to suicide, but it appears pitched at the complete newbie. Not, from what I read there, a very clever move even with its little disclaimer page.

As to "gushing further praises..." well, I'm guessing that you lead a fairly sheltered life. (-:

In concert with many who posted to mjg's blog, I think Automatix mostly needs a bit of refining. To actually achieve this will probably require some major developer changes, so it might work out better if someone starts a NotManualix project to integrate just the straighforward upgrades.

I tend to agree with Mr "Rake Your Own Leaves" that while one learns from dealing with the installation of relatively trivial chunks of software, a good place to start might be a simple HOWTO which tracks what Automatix wants to do. That way, a prospective Automatix user has an immediate option to do stuff alternately by using copy-&-paste into a shell.
20 August, 2007 14:49
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...
5 comments
Read more

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...
5 comments
Read more

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...
Post a Comment
Read more