Skip to main content

A break at Rocky Cape

I went for a few days’ break at the Rocky Cape Christian Community, which was a nice change & nothing like church.

I got to pick up some eggs, helped to slaughter some turkeys, did some woodwork, went for a walk along the creek to the beach, & saw a Platypus.

Break from doing nothing? Well, even that gets wearing, & as well as a change of scenery & people, I got to do some useful stuff (such as untangling a computer which had somehow been set to boot from just about every device attached to it, so started v-e-r-y slowly) & chat on completely random topics with some very knowledgeable people, including folks from Holland, Germany, the USA & Canada.

These people are immensely practical in their faith, & not nailed down to some remote authority. It reminds me a great deal of Open Source: whatever works is accepted, modulo some very minor quibbling.

I watched them help a pair who had arranged to have a baby together, but didn’t like each other (what a combination!) & the bird was messing the bloke around no end. The Community people helped him to remain as quiet, practical & stable as he could (no mean achievement!) & also managed to care for the baby for a few days while surviving many police and social-worker visits.

All of this while remaining civil & courteous with myself and their other guests — most of whome were stabilising from unenviable social situations — & running a chookery, a turkeyry (sp? :-), gardens, woodwork shop, & raising about a dozen happy, well-balanced, thoughtful children.

I don’t know if there’s a scale for measuring the success of communities, but these guys definitely have something concrete going for them. Very impressive.

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
The “no authority” part doesn’t mean these guys are devoid of history, by the way. They’re socially descended from a long list of Anabaptists & Mennonites, so they’ve had lots of practice at being hammered on for not happening to agree with the Powers That Be.

They have a lot in common with FOSS there, since they’ve been laughed at & scorned (& hung, gutted, burned etc) for not so much challenging the Powers That Be as simply not agreeing with them, & so wanting to be their own people on their own time & in their own way.

They’ve had such well-known people as Luther, Zwingli, Calvin & so on working for death penalties against them. These guys, you’ll notice, are from the “peaceful” side of the Reformation. You don’t want to know what the other side wanted. And by the way, many Anabaptist converts were people such as Roman Catholic priests...

Anyway, I noticed some similarities there with the progress of FOSS.
Major said…
"[...] for not so much challenging the Powers That Be as simply not agreeing with them [...]"

If the powers that be are claiming to be the one true voice of God on earth, disagreeing with them is challenging them.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Well, yes, there is that. (-:

Thanks for cutting quickly through to a core issue, as usual, Major.

What they did was not as the Reformers did, which is to stand up & proclaim “you’re wrong” but simply to toss aside any decree or doctrine they disagreed with (ie, most of them) & get on with their lives as far as they were allowed.

Which was — as you’ll no doubt point out — mortally offensive to the PTB, even the “moderate” PTB in the persons of the Reformers.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...