Skip to main content

MP3 history

I browsed across an old WAV file (converted to Ogg) today, & this is what came up:

[tuning noises]

[sung theme] “All Hit Radio”

All right, you’re listening to All Hit Radio, and it’s 53 degrees [fahrenheit?] at 30 minutes past the hour.

And right now, on our all-request line I have Mike Wedgewood on the line. What would you like to hear?

[faintly] We are observing your Earth.

He, Babe, I’m sorry, I can’t hear you too well. You’re going to have to speak a little closer into the ’phone. OK, Babe? What would you like to hear again?

We are observing your Earth.

Hey, Mike, I’m sorry, Babe, but that is not on our play-list! And by the way, you sound great over the ’phone. Anyway, if you give us your request, we’ll be glad to play it for you, Babe, so let’s hear it!

We are observing your Earth.

Uh, listen Mike, I’m sorry, Babe, but we can’t...

...and we’d like to make...

...I'm sorry, Mike, but we can’t... there’s...

...contact with you...

[pause]

...Baby.

In your mind,
you have capacity, you know
to telepath message through the vast unknown
Please close your eyes
and concentrate
with every thought you think
upon the recitation we’re about to sing...
“Calling occupants of interplanetary craft”
[etc]

Weird. I’d completely forgotten this existed. Mind you, I’ve also discovered Yacco Warner singing the names of every country in the world, & his mates singing “I am the very model of a cartoon individual”.

Oh, there’s a few others like Thomas Dolby singing “Airhead” & “My brain is like a sieve” & Jethro Tuul’s timeless classic “Thick as a brick” — all 43 minutes of it — & who knows what else?

Bananarama... Sunshine on Leith... 99 Balloons... Truly Madly Deeply... Underneath the Radar... some of these, I’m struggling to remember the CDs for, but I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t be so functional any more, & certainly if I took them back for a warranty claim, I’d get some strange looks. “This must be the Light version — I can see right through it!”

Some of these I backed up more than 13 years ago (onto a 160MB Seagate IDE drive), so they’d be pushing the limit for being the oldest intact files I have. Other things of similar age come on 5.25" floppy disks — chances of reading those being about zilch by now.

So I guess the answer to long-term data retention is multiple copies on old hard drives, & keep enough hardware around to spin the drives up every so often, & again when a new generation arrives. Which in this case would include ATA-buss disk controllers. The files barely escaped being written into RLL-encoded full-height drives, & I’m guessing that the next step (if I valued these files) would be SATA2 drives.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...