Skip to main content

Headbutting Windows

I keep forgetting what a PITA Windows can be.

I had files to transfer from a Win98 box to a WinXP box. Would the two talk over the network? Hah! Not even at gunpoint.

So... I pulled down WinSCP & opened a new website on a Linux box downstairs, pushing the files up to the website — including WinSCP — via SCP, then fetching them out with a web browser to unpack & install them.

Naturally, the installers wanted to put everything in C: drive — which was full. Even when I told the installers to put stuff on D: some of them disobeyed, and some put most stuff on D: but wanted to drape a drappie of stuff on C: still.

What I wound up having to do was to de-install some stuff to make enough room to convince the installers to write (mostly) to D: drive, then re-install what I’d de-installed.

Then I had to spend some time convincing applications that they really were where they’d found themselves when they ran.

Self-evident?

Nah! Too hard, it seems.

Then the installers kept wandering off into hyperspace for 20 or 30 minutes at a chunk. Why? They never confessed, but even the mouse pointer was frozen up while they had their little holidays.

However, eventually, I’ve got everything shifted in only about 5 or 6 times as long as it would’ve taken to do with Linux, and it mostly seems to be working — for now. Mission, sigh, accomplished.

I think it would be well worth duelling with WINE for the next round of this juggling of Win32 stuff.

One has to fiddle even more to make stuff work well, but OTOH, one has all of these extra controls & tools sitting close to hand which are actually capable of doing what you ask of them.

For example, you can run 8-bit-deep colours on a 24- or 32-bit-deep display, no worries. And, he types, glaring once more at a frozen installer, you can find out what’s actually happening to your programs. . . & if you dislike it, you can change it.

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
The final install of the day went on a complete holiday, I had to reset the machine this morning. Re-doing the install seems to have worked, no idea why. It complained about being unable to fit stuff on C: (which has ~2GB free) despite being told to install on D: — but seems to work afterwards.

I’ve also discovered that Win98 seems to be able to do hard-links; at least, the machine now has a folder I can click on — not marked as a short-cut (symlink) — to wind up in a completely different folder on the same drive. The folder was added by an installer. Don’t know how I’m going to safely remove that.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...