Skip to main content

Spoilt by Linux

I rebooted my laptop into ’Doze-XP for the 4th time ever, as I need to write an article featuring portability & wanted to test it & grab some screenshots.

To get Qt Designer & Ruby on, I had to muck around finding one-click downloaders instead of firing up a system tool, clicking a few times, & letting the tool sort out the dependencies — which is what I’d just done to get the same stuff installed on Mandriva Linux 2007.0.

Hurrah, though, for the authors of those installers, else I would have been unpacking Zips by hand, editing the Registry, sorting out even more dependencies, & so on.

Then I had to get the installers across to ’Doze, which refused to read anything, including a camera-formatted flash-stick, until I finally gave in & burned it all onto a CD. Floppies would have been too small (90MB of stuff to shovel across).

In addition, Qt wanted a copy of CygWin. Let’s just say that if I’d been connected to the ’net by dial-up, I would not have been pleased... but the installer found a copy of CygWin (in Europe), pulled it down & installed it for me.

The Ruby installer also volunteered to (and did) axe an earlier version of Ruby which I’d installed for an earlier writing session, before it installed the new one. Not quite up to “rpm -U” territory, let alone urpmi or apt-get, but they’re starting to learn.

Qt Designer is quite happy to write an application on one platform & then run it on another. Very impressive job by TrollTech, especially when one considers the basic differences between the platforms in question.

One other little bonus; I’d installed The GIMP on it some time ago, so at least I didn’t have to wrestle with MS-Paint for the screenshots in a reasonable format.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...