Skip to main content

More T Rex barbecue?

RexBurger?

Scientists in California are trying to preserve soft Tyrannysaurus Rex tissue found after a bone was broken apart a few months ago to fit it into a helicopter for removal from the dig site.

I have trouble seeing something as reptilian (& old) making a tasty piece of barbecue & the scientists have no overt goals of reproducing the sample, but it would be kind of eerie to have RexBurger or Grilled Rex.

Given that this is soft tissue, there might be some serious squabbling about the age, too. How does one preserve meat — essentially intact — for 70 million years? Or even for the thousand or so “reasonable minimum” that it must surely have been there for?

One half-heartedly wonders what else might be possible. Wing of pteranodon? Mosasaur jaw? Whole roast diplodocus carnegii?

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
Same story, different source.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Followup-ish post from the Smithsonian. Interesting read.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Quoting the lady herself, some wise words:

“As a scientist, I don't think you should ever use the word never.”
Major said…
How does one preserve meat — essentially intact — for 70 million years?

Place it in an airtight container (like a lunp of clay), heat it to the point where any bacteria inside are killed, and then bury the container for 70 million years.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Keep it airtight — at the surface — for 70 megayears? You’re swimming in patience, lad. (-:
Major said…
Who said it was at the surface for 70M years?
Major said…
It certainly wasn't on the surface when it was found (thats why they call them "digs") it was "incorporated in a soft well-sorted sandstone which was interpreted as esturarine in origin".
[Schweitzer et. al. pp1952-3]
Leon RJ Brooks said…
Er... it was spotted because some of the bone in it was protruding from the surface & was seen:

"In 2000, Bob Harmon, a field crew chief from the Museum of the Rockies, was eating his lunch in a remote Montana canyon when he looked up and saw a bone sticking out of a rock wall. That bone turned out to be part of what may be the best preserved T. rex in the world."
Major said…
Reading on... "Over the next three summers, workers chipped away at the dinosaur, gradually removing it from the cliff face". Three summers, even at the glacial pace of paleontology, would indicate that most of it was buried.

Given that the "estuarine" sandstone was found in a desert and the state of preservation it is safe to assume that the exposure of the end is recent.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
"Gradually removing" it? Sounds like a few summers' worth in that one phrase.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...