Skip to main content

Sizzlers in Brisbane

Yesterday’s lunch expedition was much more conventional. We trundled down many tens of kilometers of 8-lane 120km“Motorway” (the Smith Street Motorway and the Pacific Motorway) into Brisbane and ate at the Sizzlers there (well... at Mermaid Beach anyway).

These banana-benders are fairly serious about their bus-lanes — there were braces of them in six-lane & even some four-lane roads. They are also quite up-front about the risks in yakking on one’s mobile en-route, as active signs on the motorway reminded us that it was $225.00 & 3 demerit points per offence. They’re pretty slack about speed-limits, though, as we saw many vehicles doing well over 120km/hr in a 110 zone.

We almost came a cropper before a careless driver. The vehicle we were following crossed an intersection, then two other vehicles entered our road by turning rightwards across & into it towards us (out of a stopping zone). Uphill. The second one followed the first & if Lucy hadn’t danced on the brake pedal we would have driven straight through it on the way past. With the accompanying crunching & screeching noises, too.

Sizzlers was kind of staggered at having to seat 11 people in one go during lunch & they occasionally ran out of stocks of things like spaghetti, buns & the potato slices; but the littlies had enormous fun wading through food like the desserts at their own pace & the salads were very tasty indeed.

It rained during lunch & the littlies fell to discussing the building’s lights (an array of 12-volt incandescents & larger flouro globes). After lunch, we stepped into a place known asMrs Flannery’s Miami” which sells “natural food” at nearly twice the price per kilo used by Kakulis Bros, but it includes some interesting items as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...