Skip to main content

You are what you eat, sort-of

This is kind of US-o-centric but includes some amazing reading.

It doesn’t say so outright, but this matches up with so much I’ve read about our intake altering our behaviour. Much grotty behaviour — say the nutritionists with some justification — should mostly be blamed on the junk-food commonly consumed by the offenders. Research in prisons and amongst teenagers backs this up solidly.

This reading covers a wider variety of topics, but does include some interesting snippets, including the improvements in heart-rate, blood pressure, disease rates and so on. Steeper gains for Vegans than for Ovo-Lacto-Vegetarians.

A couple of studies caught my eye: non-smoking non-drinking vegetarian religious group outlasted non-smoking non-drinking omnivorous religious group by 7 years (& I betcha the veggos weren’t even 100% veggo); veggos move the same amount of blood around inside their circulation with 20 beats-per-minute less; infection rates drop 97% for non-meat users; cancer rates plummetted in veggos (cancer type is dependent on primary aminal eaten by competitors); grazing-land uses over 30 times as much water as needed for fruit or veggies; 80 times as much energy to process; etc...

Yes, additives & artificials have their place in this system. No cola, no sweeteners (who needs to sweeten bananas or figs or strawberries, anyway?), no artificials, no ’backy — they all hurt, one way or another.

So... if we’re to be logical about this, it’s fruit & veggies for everyone for tea tonight, yes? There’s lots of very tasty ones to eat, too.

Think of it as “less grotty” food and you won’t be too far wrong.

Sorry if you happen to plan steak or chook or lobsters, it was time for this rant to be born.

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
Uh, checked a few references in the linked text.

The Isaiah 66:3 reference is talking about something else, but a bit of hunting turned up Genesis 1:29 to replace it.
Major said…
Hmmm. Fruit and grains for humans, greens are for animals [Genesis 1:29-30]. Might have a nasty effect on the health benefits if we took that one literally.
Leon RJ Brooks said…
In real life, you'd be hard-pressed to take it too literally.

However, we can clearly see the results of not taking it literally enough, around us, today.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...