And we’re talking about irretrievably, as in vulnerable to MS06-015 forever kind of broken.
/ME is delighted to note that the regular, reliable updates continue to arrive regularly for the forest of applications which my Linux systems are still running.
On top of this, updating them doesn’t involve a licence foo-foraw, either, when it eventually becomes likely.
I wonder if coping with irreversible breakage is factored into any of the shills’ budgets for MS’ systems’ operating costs and/or system uptimes?
Betcha ’t ain’t!
They don’t even touch the VOTW (Virus Of The Week) style of damage.
However, I have Linux systems which have been installed and running for eight years (ie, longer than Win98’s existed) continuously, all of which are still fully updated, virus-free — and will be upgraded painlessly to a new version when their time comes.
Comments
The note about "this post [...] confers no rights" ain't quite true. I have the right to laugh, and am using it. (-: Think: reliability and cost-of-ownership reports. :-)