This little footnote raises an often-asked, often-answered (in many differing ways) question:
the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, assumed 65 million years ago when some catastrophic event killed off all the dinosaurs (but apparently not the sparrows and ducks)
OK, so in my eyes the question is: what difference between sparrows and stegosauri won the sparrows a place in modern history, but the “roof-lizard” not?
Comments
For just one, consider body weight:
Weight of sparrow: 20-30g
Weight of Stegosaurus: 3000-5000Kg
That is over five orders of magnitude difference in body weight with a corresponding difference in the amount of food one has to find.
As an aside: what is the young earth creationist explaination for the disapearance of stegosauri and their many dinosaur cousins (but not sparrows) given a much shorter time frame for it to happen in?
I'll see if I can find an answer for you, but I'm guessing at this point that the... um... canonical one will hinge on the stegs not being so good at swimming during a really big flood & the spoggies being significantly better at rebuilding their population (breeding young and rapidly) after a year or so of hanging around on a big wooden boat with a handful of people and lots of other animals.
I'll post again if I see any real answer which is noticeably different to that. Every so often, a genuine jaw-dropper point pops up; not frequently, but they're well worth cruising for.
Is there any creationist expaination for the absense of stegosauri in cave paintings BTW?
"No Thag, don't draw that stupid stegosaurus, the bison is much more interesting"
WRT survivability, I read the differences as relating more to the particular circumstances surrounding the species so compared.
A sparrow wouldn't have the endurance to survive such an event well, since however it happened (several theories are raised, all with similar outcomes) it would eliminate Mr Spoggy's food at least as thoroughly as Mr Stego's.