Skip to main content

Meet a Spalacotheroid called Akidolestes


What the...? Well, a Spalacotheroid is kind of mammal-like but in the absence of definite lactation can’t validly be called a mammal — so mammaliaforme (Mammal-shaped) Akido remains.

Aki’s official species name is castorocauda lutrasimilis and (s)he is casually described as “a swimming mammal”. I say “casually” because it ain’t really a mammal (beaver-like tail, seal-like teeth array, digging-type front legs, “perfect” swimming back legs, dual-layered waterproof hair, etc) and the fossil was found (Aki was nearish Nanjing, China) amongst dinosaur fossils in Middle Jurassic strata.

So...

Dr. [Zhe-Xi; (approximately “shji-zie” to us limited Angloes)] Luo notes that the new fossil of Akidolestes is a challenge to the conventional wisdom about how therians split from monotremes in the early mammalian evolutionary history. Its unusual combination of advanced therian features and the primitive monotreme features can be the consequence of convergence, in which the hind-limb of Akidolestes has re-developed the monotreme-like features.
“Metaphorically, this newly discovered fossil mammal has a forelimb posture and gaits like those of a squirrel, with elbows tucked under its body, but its hind-limb would be sprawling with a posture that is similar to a lizard,” said Dr. Luo. “It is quite unusual that this mammal re-acquired some primitive hind-limb feature.“

Sounds almost distinctly Australian (think Platypus) in uniqueness, but apparently emigrated from near China to near North America (hence involvement from CMNH).

Akido-ish looks more interesting than a rat or cavy, but also a bit of a chore to find a home and food for here in generally-parched Western Australia. Wouldn’t do too well in many parts of WA — like the parts of the Pilbara (a little east of the coast) where rain falls only every few years or so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...