The reports of Galileo’s disagreement with the church over Heliocentrism have echoes in today’s Open Source world.
Galileo was faced by a Roman Catholic Church recently blindsided by the Reformation, and the ideas he was upholding were not science, per se (he actually held back on some extra science for church-political reasons based on Pope Urban 7’s reasoning but was not officially rehabilitated until the notorious Benedict 14’s reign), but were in essence a Pagan belief from Aristotle, long officially adopted by Augustine. So what Galileo was gently trying to do was to convince the RCC to adhere to its own official policies — a risky action at the best of times.
As anyone with a whisker of understanding of human nature might guess, this provoked a great deal of internal resentment, and landed Galileo under House Arrest.
So Galileo was aiming to have the Powers That Be start making sense — which is essentially the same as the mission of the Open Source movement, and in particular of the large and moral subset/core/purists known as the Free Software Foundation, personified by Richard Stallman.
FSF seems to be meeting very similar results to what Galileo did: much background acceptance from practical people plus some official indignation and condemnation from figureheads.
What struck me is how totally shorts-first the traditional arguments based on Galileo’s conflict are: Galileo worked to promote the PTB’s official rules as does Free Software Foundation, neither aim to destroy said rules.
I strongly suspect that FSF (and FOSS) would benefit greatly from discovering what strategies worked well for Galileo and deploying those rather than constantly wasting time headbutting the inevitably rising indignation.
Comments