Skip to main content

Excellent car tech-support!

This Japanese domestic invention (known as a “Toyota Master Ace Surf”) was carefully repaired by a local (Wanneroo) mechanic, C & A Autos Mobile Workshop.

These people deduced and completely fixed the real electrical problem which had completely evaded another reknowned commercial mechanic and two auto electricians.

The “excellent” applies to the support rather than to the van itself; it fits in the most amazing places, has the smallest turning-circle I’ve ever seen in any 4WD and prety reasonable ground clearance for a van, but was not designed to last forever, or really for driving Australia’s no-holds-barred for-real bush.

The fault which C & A fixed was a complex little fault in the wiring harness which had completely killed a huge 770-style battery (the largest one which will fit into this van), and the best the others had suggested was replacing the battery. C & A showed me the electrical fault, and said replacement suggestions would have been dead within a week — possibly within hours.

C & A were also able to get a new battery for considerably less than it would have cost us, so now we have a working 8-seater again. Hurrah! All work seriously guaranteed, too.

If you’re a Perth resident who’d like to experience similar competency for yourself, give them a call on 0414-803-185. It helps a lot to be localish (Wanneroo, Joondalup, Wangara etc) but I understand that they work in most of Perth’s Northern suburbs anyway.

They’re friendly, economical, and the big boss uses his mechanical skills to make simple little mechanisms to assist his wife with her medical issues (so he has compassion and character, too), and every customer we’ve seen arrive (including us) has driven away with a top smile. They officially do CV’s, dealer-servicing, autos, dual-controls (they support a couple of driving schools as well) and disabled-driver fittings, so they’re definitely not a shonky late-nighter but steady, realiable, patient and careful workers.

C & A’ve fixed all manner of vehicles of ours and friends, including normal cars, 4WDs, light trucks, and all manner of faults including everything from massive suspension work to replacing an electrical switch on a variety of vehicles including Aussie, Asian, European and Yankee without any obvious difficulty.

It’s very hard to do other than strongly recommend them. (-:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...