Skip to main content

Corella classic

I was reminded of this by tales from a Kiwi resident of a bird from there called a Kea or (in languages I am far from proficient in) a Mountain Parrot. For amusement, they strip things like the rubber door-seals out of quite large cars (I have seen video of one unsealng a solid door in a very few seconds).

I search-engined around for a while and found many vaguely-related-looking variants but none even claiming ownership. If you do in some way “own” the joke, please tell me in detail so that I might acknowledge a genuine author. What you read below was basically cobbled together from overhearing several (effectively random) versions spoken, and typed in ad-hoc. As far as I know, it is genuinely unique. It is “clean” (as in “not even slightly obscene” for anyone I’ve test-run it against) and almost child-safe (as often, this depends entirely on the child’s world-view, but none of mine (16g, 6b, 4g) have objected or are even gently uncomfortable).

[START]

Fred lived in a small Australian country town. He was well-liked and had many good friends but lived in a house by himself.

One day, Fred returned home to find a small bird-cage on his verandah, containing a healthy white corella [Australian-ish parrot about 50cm long, white in this case, curved orangeish beak, bluntish orangeish foot-claws]. He noted a card attached to one side of the cage and carefully read it: “My name is Chalky. I am a present from Sydney. Please look after me.”

The hand-writing matched — Sydney was a respectable and benevolent local (who picked up the name at home in Africa before emigrating) — so Fred picked up the cage and bore it carefully indoors, closing the door and releasing Chalky for familiarisation.

Corellas and the like are also generally benevolent and cheerful — but a long day in a tiny, boring cage on a hot verandah can sometimes undo (even reverse) this disposition, and it had done so. Cockatoos of all kinds (even galahs) can become very purposeful. Chalky flew up towards Fred’s face and purposefully beat away at him with wings.

Fred — understandably — took this amiss, so hurried out to his lounge to fetch some eagle gloves (seriously thick and mesh-reinforced leather gloves for raising sharp-edged eagles) and used those to gently fend off the corella. Soon this novelty waned, so Fred worked his way out to the kitchen, fetched some small wooden spatulas from a drawer, and used those to help fend more easily.

Soon this novelty also waned, so Fred shuffled across the kitchen, gently nudged the freezer lid open with a foot, and fended the corella into it (cool the bird, cool the temper — carefully used, this is a genuine bird-management technique, probably not so popular in, say, Canada or Siberia).

After a very few minutes, all was calm and quiet, which puzzled Fred because a moderately large bird like Chalky should take much longer to shed enough heat to calm right down. So Fred wedged a spatula past the freezere’s seal and used it to gently twist said seal open a few centimeters in the hope of seeing and learning something. Which he did.

A bright beak gently worked its way out from under the seal and delicately clasped the spatula, then a bird-foot with pointy orangeish punctuations followed it. Chalky gently, deftly (and apparently healthily) extracted himself from the freezer and perched on the spatula. Fred watched him with some trepidation, until Chalky bowed to Fred and humbly (to Fred’s astonishment) clearly and formally said “Sir, I apologize for my unseemly misbehaviour! Please forgive me!”

Fred left Chalky enspatulated, curious to see what else this evidently trained corella would do. Chalky then stood up, bowed down again and carefully said (to the now-dumbfounded Fred) “Sir, if I may be permitted to know, what did the chicken do?”

Comments

Leon RJ Brooks said…
Galahs: watching a handful of the smaller cockatoos called Galahs play amongst themselves will quickly demonstrate why semi-rational Australians are often dubbed a “Galah”
Leon RJ Brooks said…
...and it went on to freeze up?

Sorry-ish, just personal experience adding a little extra perspective.

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...