Skip to main content

Mambo worm demonstrates hardening of Linux systems

Linux worm turns on Mambo and PHP” opines Iain Thomson. Oh, woe, disaster, shades of CodeRed!

Not.

While it’s nice for admins to have something to do and all, and it reminds us slackers (Linux admins) that nothing is completely bulletproof, I have to express significant disappointment at the shallowness of the challenge. Why?

  • Mare.D relies upon a brace of exploits which are six and twelve months old, respectively. Any reasonably modern Linux distribution will competently self-update if told to do so. Even on a lazy once-a-week update cycle, this worm is eleven and three quarters months too late.
  • It relies upon Mambo. Who runs Mambo? None of my machines, none of any of my clients’ machines. This sucker’s playing to a very small audience. Mambo has a new security announcement; maybe next year we’ll see another worm for it? (-:
  • Even if Mambo were broken into, the exploit would download into a partition mounted “noexec” on all of my servers. GAME OVER EXPLOITER <1> and better luck next time.
  • The downloaded shell script requires access to a particular application — which may or may not be installed on any given system — to pull down the main part of the exploit.
  • The vulnerability requires PHP’s register_globals setting to be enabled, but it has been defaulted to off for the last four years.
So, well, yes, it could be a nightmare, but then again all of the molecules of air in the room could simultaneously happen to bounce out the door at once, exploding your lungs from the sudden decompression and smashing whatever’s outside your office to kindling. Just don’t bet your last dollar on it ever happening.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...