Skip to main content

Defying Gravity

ABC fm hosted a free concert by this 14-member WAAPA percussion ensemble at Government House this afternoon, so we trotted along for a listen (11 people in our group, 5 of them adults). It was excellent, highly recommended.

The first piece, here is the shell that was never ours but remembers, [yes, the capitalisation is correct] was a little spooky but every piece was interesting throughout.

Pia will be pleased to note that the most impressive players overall (IMESHO) were the second and third shortest girls, and the single most impressive performer was also femme (she played a fast-paced Brasilian composition on a Glockenspeil(?) with five (5) sticks at once, including special effects produced by whacking the ends of the bars with the “neck” of some of the sticks).

The array of instruments they featured was pretty awe-inspiring, from drums the size of a matchbox up to massive kettle-drums that sounded like thunder, via tubular bells, tiny chimes made out of “piano pins”, angklungs, rainmakers, saucepan lids and wind-chimes.

Three people playing a vibraphone at once made for interesting gymnastics (one lass of the trio also played for a bit with the “wrong” end of the sticks), and another variant with the third player on a wooden glockenspeil playing from “above” the keyboard (ever tried typing like that? «brain explodes») produced an beautiful and vaguely African-sounding effect. One other instrument which impressed me started out on Peru as a fruit-packing crate and has been modified to produce a broad range of sounds from a flat slap to a deep, booming bass; you sit on the box and tilt it back to play it by slapping one side.

Another impressive feature of the event was nephew Caleb (4yo) sleeping through the piece Fire, originally composed for the Olympics. It was very energetic, fast-paced and LOUD, roughly the same intensity as a brisk exchange of infantry fire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...