Skip to main content

Hopefully open? What turkey would trust GreedyMegaCorp Inc on that one?

Here, we discover that “Adam Jansen, a digital archivist for the state of Washington [...] and his IT team completed a three-year [USD$1.5M] project to create an open-systems-based archive management center for the state of Washington”.

So far so good. But then we discover that “Washington spent US$1 million more on a joint development project with Microsoft, which is helping the state create what it hopes will become an open format” — the glinga-a-ling-a-ling of alarm bells start sounding — and “Jansen says he is considering using Microsoft’s Office 12 and its new XML-based file format as a standard archiving format in the future”.

OK, so how many joint development programs has Microsoft run? And how many of them have resulted in truly open standards, vs how many of them have wound up either with a patent millstone around their necks, delayed until they’re obsolescent, or “adopted” and violated?

Consider that right now, Microsoft is stalling the TPM standards for all they’re worth until Longhorn Shorthorn Vista Windows 2006 (whatever it’s finally called) is released, so that they don’t have to make it comply [and if you’re planning on using it, dwell on what the panic to get it out the door will do to quality and reliability]. Consider that MS-Office’s “open” XML document formats contain arbitrary Microsoft-specific binary junk. Look back on what MS-FrontPage (and MS-Word) did to HTML.

Phrases like “butterfly in a blast furnace” come to mind when considering the chances of an MS-spawned format ever being truly open. One also has to wonder what other Microsoft-specific tarpittage those quasi-XML files are wrapped in.

Right now, today, the OASIS document format is available, does everything (useful) that Microsoft’s bastard child of sin does, and is completely, truly open and unencumbered.

If I suckered the Western Australian government into an archival project based on handing control over to a proprietary file format beclonging to a rich and notoriously greedy and controlling corporation that said corporation “hoped” would one day become a standard, somebody would be politically hung, drawn and quartered for it. Why should Washington be any different?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

new life for an old (FTX) PSU, improved life for one human

the LEDs on this 5m strip happen to emit light centred on a red that does unexpectedly helpful things to (and surprisingly deeply within) a human routinely exposed to it. it has been soldered to a Molex connector, plugged into a TFX power supply from a (retired: the MoBo is cactus) Small Form Factor PC, the assorted PSU connectors (and loose end from the strip) have been taped over. the LED strip cost $10.24 including postage, the rest cost $0, the PSU is running at 12½% of capacity, consumes less power than a laptop plug-pack despite running a fan. trial runs begin today.

every-application-is-part-of-a-toolkit at work

I have a LibreOffice Impress slideshow that I wish to turn into a narrated video. 1. export the slideshow as PNG images (if that is partially broken — as at now — at higher resolutions, Export Directly as PDF then use ‘pdftoppm’ (from the poppler-utils package) to do the same). 2. write a small C program (63 lines including comments) to display those images one at a time, writing a config file entry for Imagination (default transition: ‘cross fade’) based on when the image-viewer application (‘display,’ from the GraphicsMagick suite) is closed on each one; run that, read each image aloud, then close each image in turn. 3. run ‘Imagination’ over the config file to produce a silent MP4 video with the correct timings. 4. run ‘Audacity’ to record speech while using ‘SMPlayer’ to display the silent video, then export that recording as a WAV file. 4a. optionally, use ‘TiMIDIty’ to convert a non-copyright-encumbered MIDI tune to WAV, then import that and blend it with the speech (as a quiet b...

boundaries

pushing the actual boundaries of the physical (not extremes, the boundaries themselves) can often remove barriers not otherwise perceived. one can then often resolve an issue itself, rather than merely stonewalling at the physical consequences of the issue.