Skip to main content

Hurrah for chiropractors!

(at least, for the many competent ones, same as any other trade)

  • Tuesday night: headache/nausea

  • Wednesday morning: up at 4AM, headache/nausea/vomiting

  • Wednesday lunch: visit Bob Scott at the Como Chiropractic Clinic

  • Wednesday afternoon: headache (note: no nausea/vomiting)

  • This morning: up at 4AM, feeling great, doing stuff. Ride ~30km home from Perth, discover some horrible truths about Perth’s cycleway system.

First truth: the cycleways are definitely an afterthought. In many places you get tossed onto nearby roads and left to fend for yourself for a km or two. Some of the routes are so tortuous that I kept expecting to see a big lump of cheese to announce the achivement of some incomprehensible-to-me milestone. In one place, the “cycleway” is sueezed into a bare metre (or less) between a cyclone-mesh fence and a limestone wall; in another, it's a concrete path not more than 700mm across.

Second truth: the run more-or-less up the freeway takes you past that green plastic eyesore in Stirling. Doesn’t just run past it, requires you to face it whether approaching from north or south.

Third truth: The surface on the run past Karrinyup (Careniup, have it your way) is totally scrod. Would be most reluctant to tackle those few km in the dark even with a real bike. Big blocks of cement tilted this way and that and “temporarily patched” with bitumen — or worse, low-visibility cement, at least you can see the bitumen patches to dodge them — to cover gaps and steps up to about 25cm wide or high; other bits of path have expansion cracks in the bitumen — running along the path — up to about 3cm wide.

Fourth truth: steep and narrow pedestrian bridges with low railings can be pressed into service as dual-use bridges if your town planning sucks too much to run a cycleway along one side of the freeway, and nobody actually asks, hey, what happens if someone comes off their bike and goes over a low, flat-topped concrete railing to fall six or seven metres splat onto the freeway?

Fifth truth: the signs sometimes lie. Specifically, the sequence heading north from where the low-railed pedestrian bridge dumps you in Innaloo says: Joondalup 16km, Joondalup 15km, Joondalup 17km. What?

The signs at Hutton Street do not tell you that it’s possible to cycle through Innaloo, instead they route you across the freeway, where you get run through a swamp-turned-housing-estate and left facing the ghastly green thing, then routed back across the freeway again.

Sixth truth: If you believe the signs, you get to cross the freeway five times between West Perth and points north.

Having said all of that, many other parts of this run are wide, smooth and well-marked.

Got to test my lights in darkness for the first time, and I’ll definitely be adding a second headlight. The one covers the path right in front of the wheel nicely, but identifying up-coming turns and such is a bit iffy in some places. This will mean that my el-cheapo KMart lights will end up costing six times as much as the bike, and the lock-and-cable cost about two bikes. It’s certainly been excellent value for money.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...