Skip to main content

A pound of flesh, taken from about the heart

Today, I watched Microsoft shooting itself in the foot.

I stood at the counter in a local computer reseller, and listened to the following customer problems (C:ustomer/S:alesperson/L:eon):

  • C: I want a copy of Norton’s S: $79 thanks L: [wry grin] spot the Windows user C: [looks sad] can’t take chances [walks out with Norton’s]

  • C: do you have any memory sticks? and a virus protector? S: [shows her Flash stick range, brings out boxed copy of Norton’s ($79) plus OEM copy of McAfee ($25)] C: why is that one only $25? S: it’s an OEM version C: what’s that mean? S: ummm... L: no pretty box and no manual C: oh, is that all? S: [shrugs] yes. C: great! I’ll take this one then [selects McAfee, launches into monologue about her machine having just been fixed again... obviously resentful at having to spend even $25 to stop it happening again]

  • C: [selects all of the components for a computer with S:] Now a copy of MS-Office OEM. [which is $239 RRP exGST, nonOEM version is ~$670 incGST] S: [obviously uncomfortable] I’m sorry, I can’t sell you that C: [disbelieving] what? S: [going red] Microsoft won’t allow us to sell Office OEM except with a pre-built system C: what? I can’t believe that! what else is there? L: Microsoft’s rules have been getting sillier. if you think this is bad, go and have a look at what they put service providers through S: [nods] do you have any students in the house? C: [thinks] y-yes S: then the best I can do is to sell you the Educational version of Office Professional C: [obviously upset] yes? and what’s that cost? S: $239 [same as Ofice Basic OEM] C: [goes red] right. never mind. [walks out, leaving computer parts on desk]
Result: one sad customer, one angry customer, one shell-shocked and distressed customer, two distressed salespeople (S: and his supervisor).

I’m going to propose to the shop that they offer a copy of OpenOffice for $10 as an alternative. Yes, it’s presenting it as “second best’ or “cut-rate”, but it is presenting it. An up-to-date copy of TheOpenCD ought to do nicely. And then we can see about them offering Linux as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...