Skip to main content

Pipe dreams

Having a dinged coccyx is, as I have intimated, no fun. One of the ways of convincing the painful little malefactor to set about healing faster is to give it periods of total rest. Which means lying down (sitting is a pain in the rear anyway at the moment). Which makes using a computer kind of difficult.

Laptop Placer Mark ZeroThis and a $99 Minitar WAP is my first go at a solution.

The tubing down each side of the back of the laptop sports (so far) two tee pieces, one protruding forwards to support the laptop, and one protruding towards the centre to hold a cross-piece for extra rigidity.

The blue line across the body just below the screen is a piece of Cat5 cable, and the pipes run up the sides of the back rather than making a 45deg turn just to add some lateral stability by clamping the laptop body to the pipework at the edges. The pipes are just jammed into the fittings at this stage; when I’m sure that all is well I’ll add some end caps and lay about with the glue.

What have I learned so far?

15mm PVC water pipe is rigid enough for the job. I worried before trying this out, having seem some pretty flimsy shade-houses and the like built from the stuff, but over runs of a foot or so it’s quite reassuringly steady.

I elected to try 15mm despite my reservations because I worried that the tubing might be thick enough to inconvenience the user. As it turns out, 20mm would have also done fine, and would have been considerably stiffer again. If I ever redo this from scratch, it will be in 20mm pipe.

Even though the laptop’s weight is screenwards of the upright, it’s not screenwards enough. The laptop risks going base-over-apex if someone bounces on the bed (what, you don’t have kids?) and typing into it doesn’t feel very secure (although the actual pecking of keys goes smoothly). I’ll turn the right-angle “kangaroo feet” into tee pieces and add about 25cm of tubing to fix that.

If I can find some 45-degree “tee” peices I might even run a stiffening brace from the “heels” to the uprights. It’s not really needed for stiffness but it might help the bottom joint last longer.

I worried about the below-the-keyboard supports being too intrusive, but in practice they’re not. I’m considering adding an L-shaped foot to each to massively reduce the risk of the laptop slipping forwards off these.

I’ll run another cross-piece between two Ls at the top of the uprights, which will improve the somewhat marginal lateral stiffness as well as making it look a bit less like a backpack frame.

The laptop needs to be mounted surprisingly low. A laptop without so much vacant real estate between the user and the keyboard would not have this problem. If I had a little money to spare, I’d be eyeing off something like the MSI S270. At 1.9kg, this would be easy to support on one piece of pipe, which would not be too hard to rig up to allow it to be rotated out of the way.

Unsolved problems

I still lack a good mechanism for clamping the top of the laptop body to the frame. An occy strap might do, but it feels a bit, well, analogue to me. Suggestions welcome. Simple, easy to use, robust and cheap are (as always) the design goals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open and Shut response to Darl McBride

Hi, Darl. I see you’re being dishonest again . It’d be really nice if you could shoot straight for a change, but I think Kerry’s Dad will be selling snowplows in Hell first. Three years ago, when I first joined The SCO Group, we focused the company on the area that was most profitable and provided the most benefit to customers, investors, resellers, developers and employees: UNIX No, you focused the company on suing people, which was most profitable to lawyers and provided some golden parachutes for your buddies. People thought we were crazy. They were right. But since SCO owns the UNIX operating system The SCO Group does not own UNIX® in any sense of the word. The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark, definition and other rights , The SCO Group does not. The SCO Group doesn’t even own the UnixWare® or OpenServer® code, the rights to those are held by Novell and TSG use them only by permission and under certain conditions — which they have violate...

5x7 text dot-matrix in five minutes...

This is a fairly primitive toy I threw together today for a specific purpose, published in case it’s any use to others... feed it a list of words as command arguments, which it will then display as a 5x7 ASCII dotmatrix with ‘#’ as a dot & ‘_’ as a blank. /* * display text using a 5x7 bitmap font in ASCII letters */ static unsigned char font [] [5] = { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, // 0x20 32 { 0x00,0x00,0x6f,0x00,0x00 }, // ! 0x21 33 { 0x00,0x07,0x00,0x07,0x00 }, // " 0x22 34 { 0x14,0x7f,0x14,0x7f,0x14 }, // # 0x23 35 { 0x00,0x07,0x04,0x1e,0x00 }, // $ 0x24 36 { 0x23,0x13,0x08,0x64,0x62 }, // % 0x25 37 { 0x36,0x49,0x56,0x20,0x50 }, // & 0x26 38 { 0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00 }, // ' 0x27 39 { 0x00,0x1c,0x22,0x41,0x00 }, // ( 0x28 40 { 0x00,0x41,0x22,0x1c,0x00 }, // ) 0x29 41 { 0x14,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x14 }, // * 0x2a 42 { 0x08,0x08,0x3e,0x08,0x08 }, ...

Citizens Augmenting Government Waste

So here we have Microsoft-funded “ Citizens Against Government Waste ” (CAGW) heavily criticising Massachusetts’s switch to an internationally accepted and open document standard (not open source, open standard — but I seem to remember a large monopolist who frequently confuses the two when it suits them). I remember CAGW, they were the organisation who had dead people writing in to support Microsoft in court a few years ago — thanks to sbergman27 for the link — is this “the dead hand of CAGW” at work again? Let’s follow the money and find out. Who stands to lose the most money and control if Massachusetts switches to an unencumbered document format? Big surprise, it’s CAGW sponsor Microsoft, through their dominant MS-Office suite. Why did CAGW list Microsoft’s suite last, after two other much-less-dominant examples which are waning anyway? If you’re inclined to wallow in additional irony, consider that at leas...