tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12320946.post114637354377774726..comments2024-01-24T08:28:13.011+08:00Comments on Plantagenet Penguinista: The value in keeping junkLeon RJ Brookshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01425209164513409690noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12320946.post-1146553923648367692006-05-02T15:12:00.000+08:002006-05-02T15:12:00.000+08:00Most unquined?Paul Wayper’s insightful comments on...Most unquined?<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.mabula.net/tbfw/blosxom.cgi/2006/05/01#2006-04-30-junk-dna" REL="nofollow">Paul Wayper’s insightful comments on this</A> prompted me, in my terribly predictable fashion, to ask something like: “Why would a quine be necessarily insufficient?”<BR/><BR/>An itinerary of living critters and even some mineral-like formations are quite quinish in behaviour and seem to suit the criteria quite well (except, in the mineralistic case, junk <B>DNA</B> would not be so common).Leon RJ Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01425209164513409690noreply@blogger.com